Evaluation Averages
Main Menu  |  Evaluation Results  |  Print PDF Report  |  Print Help 

Title of Course: WEB DEVELOPMENT
Course Number: E81 104
Section Number: 01
Semester: Spring 2006
Instructors: Clark Butler (Instructor)
Completed Evaluations: 21 of 28 (75%)
Display Mode: Detail Averages | Chart Averages | Comments
Chart length based on 2% increments: Learn more
Course Section Requirements:
 Number of Quizzes n/a 
 Number of Examinations n/a 
 Number of short papers (1-5 pgs) n/a 
 Number of long papers (6+ pgs) n/a 
 Number of homework assignments n/a 
 Number of individual projects n/a 
 Number of group projects n/a 
 Number of oral presentations n/a 
 Was attendance required? No 
 Was class participation required? No 
 Were take home exams given? No 
 
Engineering Template
 
Organization and Grading (Clark Butler - Instructor) 
1.14 / 2.00 
*****************************                     
Course requirements clearly communicated?
1.19 / 2.00 
*******************************                   
Course lived up to its description?
1.24 / 2.00 
********************************                  
Understood grading procedure at the outset?
1.38 / 2.00 
***********************************               
Your grade accurately reflects understanding of the material?
1.38 / 2.00 
***********************************               
Exams covered what you expected?
1.50 / 2.00 
***************************************           
Comments on written work sufficient?
5.57 / 9.00 
********************************                  
Overall rating for organization/ grading
Course Content (Clark Butler - Instructor) 
1.29 / 2.00 
*********************************                 
Work load for course was appropriate?
1.29 / 2.00 
*********************************                 
Were you positively challenged to live up to your potential?
1.10 / 2.00 
*****************************                     
Reasonable time to complete assignments?
1.19 / 2.00 
*******************************                   
You found this course beneficial?
1.00 / 2.00 
**************************                        
Combined "real world" applications with course material?
1.48 / 2.00 
**************************************            
Overall did you spend more time on this class than others?
6.14 / 9.00 
***********************************               
Overall rating for course content
Teaching (Clark Butler - Instructor) 
1.19 / 2.00 
*******************************                   
Instructor is concerned for students?
1.10 / 2.00 
*****************************                     
Instructor is enthusiastic about course?
1.05 / 2.00 
***************************                       
Instructor demonstrated expertise in course material?
1.43 / 2.00 
*************************************             
Instructor made the course interesting?
1.47 / 2.00 
**************************************            
The TA for this course was effective?
1.38 / 2.00 
***********************************               
Lecture was organized and easy to follow?
1.14 / 2.00 
*****************************                     
Professor generally available for questions?
1.38 / 2.00 
***********************************               
Homework/ Tests were returned promptly?
6.19 / 9.00 
***********************************               
Overall rating for teaching quality?
Overall Course Evaluation (Clark Butler - Instructor) 
5.90 / 9.00 
**********************************                
Overall satisfaction with the course
Supplemental Course Professor Evaluation (Clark Butler - Instructor) 
3.94 / 7.00 
*****************************                     
The course enhanced your ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, sciences and engineering.
3.50 / 7.00 
**************************                        
The course enhanced your ability to design and conduct experiments.
3.73 / 7.00 
****************************                      
The course enhanced your ability to analyze and interpret data.
5.14 / 7.00 
**************************************            
The course enhanced your ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs.
5.73 / 7.00 
******************************************        
The course enhanced your ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.
4.07 / 7.00 
******************************                    
The course enhanced your ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.
5.00 / 7.00 
*************************************             
The course enhanced your ability to understand professional and ethical responsibility.
4.93 / 7.00 
************************************              
The course enhanced your ability to communicate effectively.
4.46 / 7.00 
*********************************                 
The course enhanced your ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and social context.
4.73 / 7.00 
***********************************               
The course helped you recognize the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning.
4.57 / 7.00 
**********************************                
The course increased your knowledge of contemporary social issues.
4.43 / 7.00 
*********************************                 
The course enhanced your ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.
4.27 / 7.00 
*******************************                   
The instructor's ability to communicate in class contributed to your ability to learn the material.
3.53 / 7.00 
**************************                        
The classroom sessions/lectures for this course were worth attending each week.
1.13 / 2.00 
*****************************                     
Was a course syllabus or a course information sheet distributed the first week of class?
1.07 / 2.00 
****************************                      
Did the syllabus explain the content and administration of the course (e.g., office hours, grading)?
1.07 / 2.00 
****************************                      
In retrospect, was the syllabus an accurate reflection of how the course was actually taught?