Log Out

Washington University Course Evaluations

Evaluation Averages

Main Menu  |  Evaluation Results  |  Print PDF Report  |  Print Help

Title of Course: WEB DEVELOPMENT Course Number: E81 104 Section Number: 01 Semester: Spring 2006 Instructors: Clark Butler (Instructor) Completed Evaluations: 21 of 28 (75%) Display Mode: Detail Averages | Chart Averages | Comments Scoring Key Bold - Score (S) - System's Average Score For the Template (D) - Department's Average Score For the Template Course Section Requirements:   Number of Quizzes   n/a     Number of Examinations   n/a     Number of short papers (1-5 pgs)   n/a     Number of long papers (6+ pgs)   n/a     Number of homework assignments   n/a     Number of individual projects   n/a     Number of group projects   n/a     Number of oral presentations   n/a     Was attendance required?   No     Was class participation required?   No     Were take home exams given?   No
Engineering Template
Organization and Grading (Clark Butler - Instructor)
1.14 (S) 1.08 of 3479 (D) 1.10 of 784		Course requirements clearly communicated?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	18 (85.71%)	3 (14.29%)
1.19 (S) 1.09 of 3479 (D) 1.11 of 784		Course lived up to its description?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	17 (80.95%)	4 (19.05%)
1.24 (S) 1.13 of 3479 (D) 1.15 of 784		Understood grading procedure at the outset?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	16 (76.19%)	5 (23.81%)
1.38 (S) 1.21 of 3479 (D) 1.23 of 784		Your grade accurately reflects understanding of the material?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	13 (61.90%)	8 (38.10%)
1.38 (S) 1.13 of 3479 (D) 1.18 of 784		Exams covered what you expected?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	13 (61.90%)	8 (38.10%)
1.50 (S) 1.22 of 3479 (D) 1.19 of 784		Comments on written work sufficient?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		1 (4.76%)	10 (47.62%)	10 (47.62%)
5.57 (S) 6.94 of 3479 (D) 6.84 of 784		Overall rating for organization/ grading
		(blank)	1 - Poor	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9 - Excellent
		0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	1 (4.76%)	2 (9.52%)	5 (23.81%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)	4 (19.05%)	2 (9.52%)
Course Content (Clark Butler - Instructor)
1.29 (S) 1.14 of 3479 (D) 1.16 of 784		Work load for course was appropriate?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	15 (71.43%)	6 (28.57%)
1.29 (S) 1.15 of 3479 (D) 1.14 of 784		Were you positively challenged to live up to your potential?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	15 (71.43%)	6 (28.57%)
1.10 (S) 1.10 of 3479 (D) 1.14 of 784		Reasonable time to complete assignments?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	19 (90.48%)	2 (9.52%)
1.19 (S) 1.17 of 3479 (D) 1.16 of 784		You found this course beneficial?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	17 (80.95%)	4 (19.05%)
1.00 (S) 1.12 of 3479 (D) 1.13 of 784		Combined "real world" applications with course material?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	21 (100.00%)	0 (0%)
1.48 (S) 1.50 of 3479 (D) 1.47 of 784		Overall did you spend more time on this class than others?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	11 (52.38%)	10 (47.62%)
6.14 (S) 6.96 of 3479 (D) 6.99 of 784		Overall rating for course content
		(blank)	1 - Poor	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9 - Excellent
		0 (0%)	1 (4.76%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	1 (4.76%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)	5 (23.81%)	4 (19.05%)	3 (14.29%)
Teaching (Clark Butler - Instructor)
1.19 (S) 1.10 of 3479 (D) 1.09 of 784		Instructor is concerned for students?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	17 (80.95%)	4 (19.05%)
1.10 (S) 1.09 of 3479 (D) 1.06 of 784		Instructor is enthusiastic about course?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	19 (90.48%)	2 (9.52%)
1.05 (S) 1.06 of 3479 (D) 1.06 of 784		Instructor demonstrated expertise in course material?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	20 (95.24%)	1 (4.76%)
1.43 (S) 1.28 of 3479 (D) 1.26 of 784		Instructor made the course interesting?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	12 (57.14%)	9 (42.86%)
1.47 (S) 1.36 of 3479 (D) 1.30 of 784		The TA for this course was effective?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		2 (9.52%)	10 (47.62%)	9 (42.86%)
1.38 (S) 1.23 of 3479 (D) 1.25 of 784		Lecture was organized and easy to follow?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	13 (61.90%)	8 (38.10%)
1.14 (S) 1.09 of 3479 (D) 1.07 of 784		Professor generally available for questions?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	18 (85.71%)	3 (14.29%)
1.38 (S) 1.20 of 3479 (D) 1.23 of 784		Homework/ Tests were returned promptly?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		0 (0%)	13 (61.90%)	8 (38.10%)
6.19 (S) 6.95 of 3479 (D) 7.08 of 784		Overall rating for teaching quality?
		(blank)	1 - Poor	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9 - Excellent
		0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)	0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)	2 (9.52%)	0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)	6 (28.57%)	3 (14.29%)	4 (19.05%)
Overall Course Evaluation (Clark Butler - Instructor)
5.90 (S) 6.77 of 3479 (D) 6.81 of 784		Overall satisfaction with the course
		(blank)	1 - Poor	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9 - Excellent
		0 (0%)	3 (14.29%)	0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)	0 (0%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)	8 (38.10%)	0 (0%)	4 (19.05%)
Grade (Clark Butler - Instructor)
		Expected grade for this course
		(blank)	A	B	C	D	F	P
		0 (0%)	14 (66.67%)	4 (19.05%)	1 (4.76%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)
Supplemental Course Professor Evaluation (Clark Butler - Instructor)
3.94 (S) 5.37 of 3479 (D) 5.33 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, sciences and engineering.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		4 (19.05%)	4 (19.05%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	1 (4.76%)	4 (19.05%)	3 (14.29%)	2 (9.52%)
3.50 (S) 4.31 of 3479 (D) 4.43 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to design and conduct experiments.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		7 (33.33%)	4 (19.05%)	1 (4.76%)	2 (9.52%)	3 (14.29%)	1 (4.76%)	1 (4.76%)	2 (9.52%)
3.73 (S) 4.96 of 3479 (D) 4.87 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to analyze and interpret data.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		6 (28.57%)	3 (14.29%)	3 (14.29%)	1 (4.76%)	1 (4.76%)	4 (19.05%)	1 (4.76%)	2 (9.52%)
5.14 (S) 5.04 of 3479 (D) 5.41 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		7 (33.33%)	0 (0%)	1 (4.76%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)	2 (9.52%)	4 (19.05%)	3 (14.29%)
5.73 (S) 4.40 of 3479 (D) 4.34 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to function on multidisciplinary teams.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		6 (28.57%)	0 (0%)	0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)	0 (0%)	3 (14.29%)	5 (23.81%)	5 (23.81%)
4.07 (S) 5.20 of 3479 (D) 5.14 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		7 (33.33%)	3 (14.29%)	0 (0%)	4 (19.05%)	0 (0%)	3 (14.29%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)
5.00 (S) 4.21 of 3479 (D) 4.07 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to understand professional and ethical responsibility.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		6 (28.57%)	1 (4.76%)	0 (0%)	3 (14.29%)	0 (0%)	4 (19.05%)	4 (19.05%)	3 (14.29%)
4.93 (S) 4.58 of 3479 (D) 4.67 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to communicate effectively.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		6 (28.57%)	2 (9.52%)	0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)	2 (9.52%)	5 (23.81%)
4.46 (S) 4.42 of 3479 (D) 4.26 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and social context.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		8 (38.10%)	1 (4.76%)	2 (9.52%)	0 (0%)	4 (19.05%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)
4.73 (S) 4.80 of 3479 (D) 4.75 of 784		The course helped you recognize the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		6 (28.57%)	2 (9.52%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	0 (0%)	1 (4.76%)	6 (28.57%)	3 (14.29%)
4.57 (S) 3.76 of 3479 (D) 3.40 of 784		The course increased your knowledge of contemporary social issues.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		7 (33.33%)	2 (9.52%)	2 (9.52%)	0 (0%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)	3 (14.29%)	3 (14.29%)
4.43 (S) 5.22 of 3479 (D) 5.33 of 784		The course enhanced your ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		7 (33.33%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	2 (9.52%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	3 (14.29%)	3 (14.29%)
4.27 (S) 5.13 of 3479 (D) 5.14 of 784		The instructor's ability to communicate in class contributed to your ability to learn the material.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		6 (28.57%)	2 (9.52%)	1 (4.76%)	1 (4.76%)	4 (19.05%)	4 (19.05%)	0 (0%)	3 (14.29%)
3.53 (S) 5.10 of 3479 (D) 4.98 of 784		The classroom sessions/lectures for this course were worth attending each week.
		(blank)	1 - Strongly Disagree	2	3	4	5	6	7 - Strongly Agree
		6 (28.57%)	3 (14.29%)	2 (9.52%)	3 (14.29%)	2 (9.52%)	3 (14.29%)	0 (0%)	2 (9.52%)
1.13 (S) 1.04 of 3479 (D) 1.07 of 784		Was a course syllabus or a course information sheet distributed the first week of class?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		6 (28.57%)	13 (61.90%)	2 (9.52%)
1.07 (S) 1.04 of 3479 (D) 1.05 of 784		Did the syllabus explain the content and administration of the course (e.g., office hours, grading)?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		6 (28.57%)	14 (66.67%)	1 (4.76%)
1.07 (S) 1.08 of 3479 (D) 1.09 of 784		In retrospect, was the syllabus an accurate reflection of how the course was actually taught?
		(blank)	Yes	No
		6 (28.57%)	14 (66.67%)	1 (4.76%)