| Title of Course: WEB DEVELOPMENT |
| Course Number: E81 104 |
| Section Number: 01 |
| Semester: Spring 2005 |
| Instructors: Clark Butler (instructor) |
| Completed Evaluations: 21 of 37 (57%) |
| Display Mode: Detail Averages | Chart Averages | Comments |
| Chart length based on 2% increments: Learn more |
|
| Course Section Requirements: |
| | Number of Quizzes | | n/a | |
| | Number of Examinations | | n/a | |
| | Number of short papers (1-5 pgs) | | n/a | |
| | Number of long papers (6+ pgs) | | n/a | |
| | Number of homework assignments | | n/a | |
| | Number of individual projects | | n/a | |
| | Number of group projects | | n/a | |
| | Number of oral presentations | | n/a | |
| | Was attendance required? | | n/a | |
| | Was class participation required? | | n/a | |
| | Were take home exams given? | | n/a | |
|
|
|
| |
| Engineering Template |
| |
| Organization and Grading (NOT instructor specific) |
| 1.05 / 2.00 | |
| *************************** | |
| Course requirements clearly communicated? |
| 1.05 / 2.00 | |
| *************************** | |
| Course lived up to its description? |
| 1.14 / 2.00 | |
| ***************************** | |
| Understood grading procedure at the outset? |
| 1.29 / 2.00 | |
| ********************************* | |
| Your grade accurately reflects understanding of the material? |
| 1.33 / 2.00 | |
| ********************************** | |
| Exams covered what you expected? |
| 1.21 / 2.00 | |
| ******************************* | |
| Comments on written work sufficient? |
| 6.95 / 9.00 | |
| **************************************** | |
| Overall rating for organization/ grading |
| Course Content (NOT instructor specific) |
| 1.33 / 2.00 | |
| ********************************** | |
| Work load for course was appropriate? |
| 1.10 / 2.00 | |
| ***************************** | |
| Were you positively challenged to live up to your potential? |
| 1.05 / 2.00 | |
| *************************** | |
| Reasonable time to complete assignments? |
| 1.05 / 2.00 | |
| *************************** | |
| You found this course beneficial? |
| 1.00 / 2.00 | |
| ************************** | |
| Combined "real world" applications with course material? |
| 1.65 / 2.00 | |
| ****************************************** | |
| Overall did you spend more time on this class than others? |
| 6.95 / 9.00 | |
| **************************************** | |
| Overall rating for course content |
| Overall Course Evaluation (NOT instructor specific) |
| 6.86 / 9.00 | |
| *************************************** | |
| Overall satisfaction with the course |
| Supplemental Course Professor Evaluation (NOT instructor specific) |
| 4.00 / 7.00 | |
| ****************************** | |
| The course enhanced your ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, sciences and engineering. |
| 3.62 / 7.00 | |
| *************************** | |
| The course enhanced your ability to design and conduct experiments. |
| 4.92 / 7.00 | |
| ************************************ | |
| The course enhanced your ability to analyze and interpret data. |
| 5.67 / 7.00 | |
| ***************************************** | |
| The course enhanced your ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. |
| 5.77 / 7.00 | |
| ****************************************** | |
| The course enhanced your ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. |
| 4.46 / 7.00 | |
| ********************************* | |
| The course enhanced your ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. |
| 4.69 / 7.00 | |
| *********************************** | |
| The course enhanced your ability to understand professional and ethical responsibility. |
| 5.57 / 7.00 | |
| ***************************************** | |
| The course enhanced your ability to communicate effectively. |
| 4.38 / 7.00 | |
| ******************************** | |
| The course enhanced your ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and social context. |
| 4.92 / 7.00 | |
| ************************************ | |
| The course helped you recognize the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning. |
| 4.00 / 7.00 | |
| ****************************** | |
| The course increased your knowledge of contemporary social issues. |
| 4.85 / 7.00 | |
| ************************************ | |
| The course enhanced your ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. |
| 5.00 / 7.00 | |
| ************************************* | |
| The instructor's ability to communicate in class contributed to your ability to learn the material. |
| 3.86 / 7.00 | |
| ***************************** | |
| The classroom sessions/lectures for this course were worth attending each week. |
| 1.07 / 2.00 | |
| **************************** | |
| Was a course syllabus or a course information sheet distributed the first week of class? |
| 1.07 / 2.00 | |
| **************************** | |
| Did the syllabus explain the content and administration of the course (e.g., office hours, grading)? |
| 1.07 / 2.00 | |
| **************************** | |
| In retrospect, was the syllabus an accurate reflection of how the course was actually taught? |
| Teaching (Clark Butler - instructor) |
| 1.05 / 2.00 | |
| *************************** | |
| Instructor is concerned for students? |
| 1.00 / 2.00 | |
| ************************** | |
| Instructor is enthusiastic about course? |
| 1.00 / 2.00 | |
| ************************** | |
| Instructor demonstrated expertise in course material? |
| 1.14 / 2.00 | |
| ***************************** | |
| Instructor made the course interesting? |
| 1.24 / 2.00 | |
| ******************************** | |
| The TA for this course was effective? |
| 1.05 / 2.00 | |
| *************************** | |
| Lecture was organized and easy to follow? |
| 1.05 / 2.00 | |
| *************************** | |
| Professor generally available for questions? |
| 1.58 / 2.00 | |
| ***************************************** | |
| Homework/ Tests were returned promptly? |
| 7.38 / 9.00 | |
| ****************************************** | |
| Overall rating for teaching quality? |