| Title of Course: WEB DEVELOPMENT |
| Course Number: E81 104 |
| Section Number: 01 |
| Semester: Spring 2005 |
| Instructors: Clark Butler (instructor) |
| Completed Evaluations: 21 of 37 (57%) |
| Display Mode: Detail Averages | Chart Averages | Comments |
Scoring Key Bold - Score (S) - System's Average Score For the Template (D) - Department's Average Score For the Template |
|
| Course Section Requirements: |
| | Number of Quizzes | | n/a | |
| | Number of Examinations | | n/a | |
| | Number of short papers (1-5 pgs) | | n/a | |
| | Number of long papers (6+ pgs) | | n/a | |
| | Number of homework assignments | | n/a | |
| | Number of individual projects | | n/a | |
| | Number of group projects | | n/a | |
| | Number of oral presentations | | n/a | |
| | Was attendance required? | | n/a | |
| | Was class participation required? | | n/a | |
| | Were take home exams given? | | n/a | |
|
|
|
| |
| Engineering Template |
| |
| Organization and Grading (NOT instructor specific) |
1.05 (S) 1.07 of 3680 (D) 1.08 of 843 | | Course requirements clearly communicated? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 20 (95.24%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.05 (S) 1.08 of 3680 (D) 1.10 of 843 | | Course lived up to its description? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 20 (95.24%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.14 (S) 1.14 of 3680 (D) 1.17 of 843 | | Understood grading procedure at the outset? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 18 (85.71%) | 3 (14.29%) | |
1.29 (S) 1.19 of 3680 (D) 1.18 of 843 | | Your grade accurately reflects understanding of the material? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 15 (71.43%) | 6 (28.57%) | |
1.33 (S) 1.14 of 3680 (D) 1.14 of 843 | | Exams covered what you expected? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 14 (66.67%) | 7 (33.33%) | |
1.21 (S) 1.24 of 3680 (D) 1.24 of 843 | | Comments on written work sufficient? |
| | |
| | 2 (9.52%) | 15 (71.43%) | 4 (19.05%) | |
6.95 (S) 7.01 of 3680 (D) 7.02 of 843 | | Overall rating for organization/ grading |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | 5 (23.81%) | 7 (33.33%) | 3 (14.29%) | 4 (19.05%) | |
| Course Content (NOT instructor specific) |
1.33 (S) 1.12 of 3680 (D) 1.13 of 843 | | Work load for course was appropriate? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 14 (66.67%) | 7 (33.33%) | |
1.10 (S) 1.14 of 3680 (D) 1.12 of 843 | | Were you positively challenged to live up to your potential? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 19 (90.48%) | 2 (9.52%) | |
1.05 (S) 1.07 of 3680 (D) 1.08 of 843 | | Reasonable time to complete assignments? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 20 (95.24%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.05 (S) 1.15 of 3680 (D) 1.11 of 843 | | You found this course beneficial? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 20 (95.24%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.00 (S) 1.10 of 3680 (D) 1.13 of 843 | | Combined "real world" applications with course material? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 21 (100.00%) | 0 (0%) | |
1.65 (S) 1.53 of 3680 (D) 1.51 of 843 | | Overall did you spend more time on this class than others? |
| | |
| | 1 (4.76%) | 7 (33.33%) | 13 (61.90%) | |
6.95 (S) 7.06 of 3680 (D) 7.21 of 843 | | Overall rating for course content |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (9.52%) | 1 (4.76%) | 4 (19.05%) | 6 (28.57%) | 5 (23.81%) | 3 (14.29%) | |
| Overall Course Evaluation (NOT instructor specific) |
6.86 (S) 6.79 of 3680 (D) 6.99 of 843 | | Overall satisfaction with the course |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (9.52%) | 1 (4.76%) | 1 (4.76%) | 4 (19.05%) | 3 (14.29%) | 6 (28.57%) | 4 (19.05%) | |
| Grade (NOT instructor specific) |
| | | Expected grade for this course |
| | |
| | 1 (4.76%) | 11 (52.38%) | 7 (33.33%) | 1 (4.76%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
| Supplemental Course Professor Evaluation (NOT instructor specific) |
4.00 (S) 5.44 of 3680 (D) 5.46 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, sciences and engineering. |
| | |
| | 7 (33.33%) | 1 (4.76%) | 1 (4.76%) | 3 (14.29%) | 3 (14.29%) | 5 (23.81%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
3.62 (S) 4.26 of 3680 (D) 4.50 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to design and conduct experiments. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (9.52%) | 1 (4.76%) | 4 (19.05%) | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (9.52%) | 0 (0%) | |
4.92 (S) 5.01 of 3680 (D) 5.12 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to analyze and interpret data. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (19.05%) | 7 (33.33%) | 1 (4.76%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
5.67 (S) 4.97 of 3680 (D) 5.59 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs. |
| | |
| | 6 (28.57%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | 6 (28.57%) | 5 (23.81%) | 3 (14.29%) | |
5.77 (S) 4.30 of 3680 (D) 4.44 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to function on multidisciplinary teams. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (9.52%) | 6 (28.57%) | |
4.46 (S) 5.27 of 3680 (D) 5.31 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | 1 (4.76%) | 4 (19.05%) | 6 (28.57%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
4.69 (S) 4.20 of 3680 (D) 4.17 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to understand professional and ethical responsibility. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | 1 (4.76%) | 4 (19.05%) | 4 (19.05%) | 1 (4.76%) | 2 (9.52%) | |
5.57 (S) 4.48 of 3680 (D) 4.66 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to communicate effectively. |
| | |
| | 7 (33.33%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (14.29%) | 4 (19.05%) | 3 (14.29%) | 4 (19.05%) | |
4.38 (S) 4.49 of 3680 (D) 4.33 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and social context. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (9.52%) | 0 (0%) | 5 (23.81%) | 4 (19.05%) | 1 (4.76%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
4.92 (S) 4.81 of 3680 (D) 4.89 of 843 | | The course helped you recognize the need for, and an ability to engage in, life-long learning. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | 5 (23.81%) | 3 (14.29%) | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (9.52%) | |
4.00 (S) 3.73 of 3680 (D) 3.65 of 843 | | The course increased your knowledge of contemporary social issues. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 1 (4.76%) | 1 (4.76%) | 3 (14.29%) | 2 (9.52%) | 4 (19.05%) | 2 (9.52%) | 0 (0%) | |
4.85 (S) 5.27 of 3680 (D) 5.40 of 843 | | The course enhanced your ability to use the techniques, skills and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (4.76%) | 1 (4.76%) | 3 (14.29%) | 4 (19.05%) | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (9.52%) | |
5.00 (S) 5.16 of 3680 (D) 5.31 of 843 | | The instructor's ability to communicate in class contributed to your ability to learn the material. |
| | |
| | 8 (38.10%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 4 (19.05%) | 1 (4.76%) | 3 (14.29%) | 1 (4.76%) | 4 (19.05%) | |
3.86 (S) 5.25 of 3680 (D) 5.32 of 843 | | The classroom sessions/lectures for this course were worth attending each week. |
| | |
| | 7 (33.33%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (9.52%) | 4 (19.05%) | 4 (19.05%) | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (9.52%) | 0 (0%) | |
1.07 (S) 1.05 of 3680 (D) 1.07 of 843 | | Was a course syllabus or a course information sheet distributed the first week of class? |
| | |
| | 7 (33.33%) | 13 (61.90%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.07 (S) 1.05 of 3680 (D) 1.06 of 843 | | Did the syllabus explain the content and administration of the course (e.g., office hours, grading)? |
| | |
| | 7 (33.33%) | 13 (61.90%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.07 (S) 1.09 of 3680 (D) 1.09 of 843 | | In retrospect, was the syllabus an accurate reflection of how the course was actually taught? |
| | |
| | 6 (28.57%) | 14 (66.67%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
| Teaching (Clark Butler - instructor) |
1.05 (S) 1.09 of 3680 (D) 1.07 of 843 | | Instructor is concerned for students? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 20 (95.24%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.00 (S) 1.09 of 3680 (D) 1.06 of 843 | | Instructor is enthusiastic about course? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 21 (100.00%) | 0 (0%) | |
1.00 (S) 1.06 of 3680 (D) 1.08 of 843 | | Instructor demonstrated expertise in course material? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 21 (100.00%) | 0 (0%) | |
1.14 (S) 1.28 of 3680 (D) 1.26 of 843 | | Instructor made the course interesting? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 18 (85.71%) | 3 (14.29%) | |
1.24 (S) 1.34 of 3680 (D) 1.27 of 843 | | The TA for this course was effective? |
| | |
| | 4 (19.05%) | 13 (61.90%) | 4 (19.05%) | |
1.05 (S) 1.21 of 3680 (D) 1.21 of 843 | | Lecture was organized and easy to follow? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 20 (95.24%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.05 (S) 1.10 of 3680 (D) 1.08 of 843 | | Professor generally available for questions? |
| | |
| | 1 (4.76%) | 19 (90.48%) | 1 (4.76%) | |
1.58 (S) 1.18 of 3680 (D) 1.20 of 843 | | Homework/ Tests were returned promptly? |
| | |
| | 2 (9.52%) | 8 (38.10%) | 11 (52.38%) | |
7.38 (S) 7.07 of 3680 (D) 7.16 of 843 | | Overall rating for teaching quality? |
| | |
| | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 2 (9.52%) | 2 (9.52%) | 6 (28.57%) | 8 (38.10%) | 3 (14.29%) | |